Biasi B-3 or B-4
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 6
Upvotes: 0
Received 0 Upvotes
on
0 Posts
Biasi B-3 or B-4
Here is dilemma:
I have 1800 sq ft house, 2 story half finished basement built in 1955. I have recently added R-30 in attic in addition to 4 inch rockwool that was there in cavity. I know that 2nd story walls have rockwool insulation. I do not know about 1st floor or half basement part. So I buy online Heatloss calc online and did the calculation myself. I have forced water setup with radiators on first floor and baseboard on 2nd floor.
I am installing new Biasi as follow.
Heatloss is coming at 54000 BTU (onservative estimate considering there is no insulation on 1st floor or basement)
2 Zones
Indirect Hot water 45 Gallon from Superstor SSU-45
Biasi B-4
I have scheduled installation next week for Biasi B-4 which has a net output of 84K BTU.
But I am not able to find anything about Indirect BTU requirement. So my question is Do I need Biasi B-4 or B-3 which has a net output of 58K BTU.
Please help.
I have 1800 sq ft house, 2 story half finished basement built in 1955. I have recently added R-30 in attic in addition to 4 inch rockwool that was there in cavity. I know that 2nd story walls have rockwool insulation. I do not know about 1st floor or half basement part. So I buy online Heatloss calc online and did the calculation myself. I have forced water setup with radiators on first floor and baseboard on 2nd floor.
I am installing new Biasi as follow.
Heatloss is coming at 54000 BTU (onservative estimate considering there is no insulation on 1st floor or basement)
2 Zones
Indirect Hot water 45 Gallon from Superstor SSU-45
Biasi B-4
I have scheduled installation next week for Biasi B-4 which has a net output of 84K BTU.
But I am not able to find anything about Indirect BTU requirement. So my question is Do I need Biasi B-4 or B-3 which has a net output of 58K BTU.
Please help.
#2
Can't find anything on SSU-45 ? I should think a quick google would turn up scads of info on that indirect... very popular (and good!).
http://www.htproducts.com/literature/lp-81.pdf
The specs for the SSU call for a boiler size of 141K ... but remember, that is to MEET the published 'first hour' and 'recovery' specs. Even firing with 84K, you are already compromised... but remember that indirects are much better than gas fired stand-alone, and WAY MUCH better than electrics... so even with that compromise, you will probably be satisified with the performance. There are ways to calculate the effects of down-sizing the boiler in terms of the recover and first hour, but I don't know them off hand... maybe our good friend Xiphias can jump in, because I think he has that info stored in his BioRam module.
When making envelope improvements on a home and lowering the heat loss, at some point a compromise needs to be made between the space heating requirements and the water heating requirements.
I don't know that I would want to go much lower than say 80K if running an indirect... and it's not really _that_ much higher than the space heating needs...
http://www.htproducts.com/literature/lp-81.pdf
The specs for the SSU call for a boiler size of 141K ... but remember, that is to MEET the published 'first hour' and 'recovery' specs. Even firing with 84K, you are already compromised... but remember that indirects are much better than gas fired stand-alone, and WAY MUCH better than electrics... so even with that compromise, you will probably be satisified with the performance. There are ways to calculate the effects of down-sizing the boiler in terms of the recover and first hour, but I don't know them off hand... maybe our good friend Xiphias can jump in, because I think he has that info stored in his BioRam module.
When making envelope improvements on a home and lowering the heat loss, at some point a compromise needs to be made between the space heating requirements and the water heating requirements.
I don't know that I would want to go much lower than say 80K if running an indirect... and it's not really _that_ much higher than the space heating needs...
#3
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 6
Upvotes: 0
Received 0 Upvotes
on
0 Posts
B-4 or B-5
Thanks for the reply NJ Trooper, In that case I really need help.
I still have an option to change it to B-5 If I want to which has a net output of 108K BTU.
Currently I have 30 gallon separate hot water heater and WH Smith boiler 125k BTU (really old) so what do you suggest since going to 141k BTU or anything near really does not make sense for 1800 sq ft.
I am just confused, I thought newer boilers are much more efficient. My current boiler is may be 40-50% efficient.
I am not a pro so please bear with me.
Help!!
I still have an option to change it to B-5 If I want to which has a net output of 108K BTU.
Currently I have 30 gallon separate hot water heater and WH Smith boiler 125k BTU (really old) so what do you suggest since going to 141k BTU or anything near really does not make sense for 1800 sq ft.
I am just confused, I thought newer boilers are much more efficient. My current boiler is may be 40-50% efficient.
I am not a pro so please bear with me.
Help!!
Last edited by eastwest98; 10-25-10 at 07:19 PM.
#4
Hang on... maybe you missed this sentence?
I said:
and what I meant was that the 84K B4 will probably be sufficient, and meet your needs.
If you don't have a family full of people that take long showers one after another, and run the clothes washer, and the dishwasher at the same time... you will be satisfied, I think.
If your oil fired water heater is still in good shape, why not keep it for a few more years, and have the system prepared for a future addition of the indirect heater by having the installers add 'stubs' to connect to when the time comes?
Indirect is VERY efficient, I don't know why you got the impression that it's not?
I said:
so even with that compromise, you will probably be satisified with the performance.
If you don't have a family full of people that take long showers one after another, and run the clothes washer, and the dishwasher at the same time... you will be satisfied, I think.
If your oil fired water heater is still in good shape, why not keep it for a few more years, and have the system prepared for a future addition of the indirect heater by having the installers add 'stubs' to connect to when the time comes?
Indirect is VERY efficient, I don't know why you got the impression that it's not?
#5
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,338
Upvotes: 0
Received 0 Upvotes
on
0 Posts
I'd go with the 84k B4. Use a DHW priority control, or even better an outdoor reset control with DHW priority built in. Pipe a bypass for some thermal protection and enjoy the comfort and savings. The priority control allows the space heating to turn off for a few minutes while the indirect gets the full output of the boiler.
Candidate controls include stuff like
) tekmar 260
) Taco ZVC - EXP or SR -EXP with PC-700 outdoor reset control and priority protection plug in (PC-6xx)
) Honeywell aq251
The B5 is too big and the B3 too small.
Biasi doesn't give good (any?) piping diagrams but you could use a number of them. Here's one for the Burnham MPO. Figures 13a or 13b would do fine.
http://www.usboiler.burnham.com/pdf/...&O%207-101.pdf
Candidate controls include stuff like
) tekmar 260
) Taco ZVC - EXP or SR -EXP with PC-700 outdoor reset control and priority protection plug in (PC-6xx)
) Honeywell aq251
The B5 is too big and the B3 too small.
Biasi doesn't give good (any?) piping diagrams but you could use a number of them. Here's one for the Burnham MPO. Figures 13a or 13b would do fine.
http://www.usboiler.burnham.com/pdf/...&O%207-101.pdf
#6
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 6
Upvotes: 0
Received 0 Upvotes
on
0 Posts
Sounds good
Thank you NJ Trooper and Xiphias for your insight.
"If your oil fired water heater is still in good shape, why not keep it for a few more years"
Actually water tank is leaking so I decided to replace entire setup just so I can have Indirect water heater.
Xiphias,
DHW Priority sounds like a good idea. I will check them out, Do you prefer one over the other brand wise?
I was curious as to what kind of input did SuperStor used to come up with 141K BTU suggestion, for example least efficient traditional cast iron boiler? space heating for 2000 sq ft?
I will definitely have more questions.
"If your oil fired water heater is still in good shape, why not keep it for a few more years"
Actually water tank is leaking so I decided to replace entire setup just so I can have Indirect water heater.
Xiphias,
DHW Priority sounds like a good idea. I will check them out, Do you prefer one over the other brand wise?
I was curious as to what kind of input did SuperStor used to come up with 141K BTU suggestion, for example least efficient traditional cast iron boiler? space heating for 2000 sq ft?
I will definitely have more questions.
#7
Why do you think your existing boiler is only 40-50% ? How old is it? what make/model?
It is possible to install in indirect on nearly any hot water boiler... so you don't _have to_ replace the boiler to get an indirect... but if your boiler is really that bad, I guess it could be a good move.
It is possible to install in indirect on nearly any hot water boiler... so you don't _have to_ replace the boiler to get an indirect... but if your boiler is really that bad, I guess it could be a good move.
#8
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,338
Upvotes: 0
Received 0 Upvotes
on
0 Posts
Of those, I am most familiar with the tekmar 260 because it runs my system. Quite happy with it. The others provide basically the same functionality. (Although the 260 can take input from one or more indoor sensors, which I use and IMHO really rocks, but that's definitely not essential for your case.)
As to where they get the indirect numbers, it's something of a game, as there really aren't clear-cut standards. For example, some manuf. use 180F water in their calcs, some 200F. Some use 70F rise, some use 90F. But whatever. Some simple math gets one in the ballgame.
Consider:
45 gal indirect, 84k output boiler.
45 gallons of water weighs 375 pounds.
It takes one BTU to raise 1 pound of water 1 degree F.
Assume incoming water temp of 50F. You want 140F (and will temper this with an anti-scald mixing valve like a Taco 5000 series or Honeywell/Sparco AM101C to get 115F or so at the taps). That's a 90F rise.
375 lb * 90 F = 33750 BTU required to turn 50F water into 140F water. (Units of BTU are pounds and Fahrenheit.)
33750 BTU / 84000 BTU/hr = .4 hr to do the work. That's 24 minutes to heat the whole tank from 50F, which is an absolute worst-case scenario that really only happens the very first time you fill it after installation.
A more realistic scenario is you start a draw (e.g., shower), and the tank starts to drop to 120F from 140F. It probably has a 15F differential aquastat control so definitely by the time the tank starts calling, you have maybe 20 gal of new cold water that needs to get heated maybe 50F by the time it's all mixed in there.
20 * 8.33 * 50 = 8330 BTU
8330 / 84000 = 6 minutes
As to where they get the indirect numbers, it's something of a game, as there really aren't clear-cut standards. For example, some manuf. use 180F water in their calcs, some 200F. Some use 70F rise, some use 90F. But whatever. Some simple math gets one in the ballgame.
Consider:
45 gal indirect, 84k output boiler.
45 gallons of water weighs 375 pounds.
It takes one BTU to raise 1 pound of water 1 degree F.
Assume incoming water temp of 50F. You want 140F (and will temper this with an anti-scald mixing valve like a Taco 5000 series or Honeywell/Sparco AM101C to get 115F or so at the taps). That's a 90F rise.
375 lb * 90 F = 33750 BTU required to turn 50F water into 140F water. (Units of BTU are pounds and Fahrenheit.)
33750 BTU / 84000 BTU/hr = .4 hr to do the work. That's 24 minutes to heat the whole tank from 50F, which is an absolute worst-case scenario that really only happens the very first time you fill it after installation.
A more realistic scenario is you start a draw (e.g., shower), and the tank starts to drop to 120F from 140F. It probably has a 15F differential aquastat control so definitely by the time the tank starts calling, you have maybe 20 gal of new cold water that needs to get heated maybe 50F by the time it's all mixed in there.
20 * 8.33 * 50 = 8330 BTU
8330 / 84000 = 6 minutes
#9
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 6
Upvotes: 0
Received 0 Upvotes
on
0 Posts
Boiler
NJ Trooper,
I am being told that my boiler is probably as old as my house is which is atleast 55 years old. The way it takes oil is almost shocking, last winter was my first and I am sure boiler was not even serviced by previous owner. it took 200 gallons in 20 days. I was shocked to see $500.00 burn thro the chimney.
Make is WH Smith, I am not sure which model but it is rated 125 K btu. it is probably 4 feet high and has 2 doors to clean the chamber.
Xiphias,
So far this is the best analysis I have seen so far for any indirect water heating. I am sure this will be helpful to soooo many ppl who are looking for answers.
About the calc, "20 * 8.33 * 50 = 8330 BTU" I got 20 Gallon * 8.33 ? * 50 F = 8330 btu. What is 8.33 in the equation, just curious.
Thanks for your time and effort.
I am being told that my boiler is probably as old as my house is which is atleast 55 years old. The way it takes oil is almost shocking, last winter was my first and I am sure boiler was not even serviced by previous owner. it took 200 gallons in 20 days. I was shocked to see $500.00 burn thro the chimney.
Make is WH Smith, I am not sure which model but it is rated 125 K btu. it is probably 4 feet high and has 2 doors to clean the chamber.
Xiphias,
So far this is the best analysis I have seen so far for any indirect water heating. I am sure this will be helpful to soooo many ppl who are looking for answers.
About the calc, "20 * 8.33 * 50 = 8330 BTU" I got 20 Gallon * 8.33 ? * 50 F = 8330 btu. What is 8.33 in the equation, just curious.
Thanks for your time and effort.
#10
Jeeze... and to think I get all bent outta shape when I burn THREE gallons in a day! I can't imagine TEN! Maybe convert it back to coal? KIDDING! 
I believe the 8.33 in Xiph's formulas is the weight (pounds) of a gallon of water.

I believe the 8.33 in Xiph's formulas is the weight (pounds) of a gallon of water.
#12
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 6
Upvotes: 0
Received 0 Upvotes
on
0 Posts

NJ Trooper,
Funny you mentioned that, I remember one of the tech who came for estimate did mentioned to me that this a conversion from coal to oil.
Thank you to both of you!!
I have finally decided to go with Biasi B-4, Indirect HW and Outdoor reset with Hot water priority. The installer wants to go with HoneyWell and I would go with what he is comfortable with installing.
He is asking $850.00 for outdoor reset and hotwater priority installed with parts. Does that sound right or a little too much for this type of job?
Funny you mentioned that, I remember one of the tech who came for estimate did mentioned to me that this a conversion from coal to oil.
Thank you to both of you!!
I have finally decided to go with Biasi B-4, Indirect HW and Outdoor reset with Hot water priority. The installer wants to go with HoneyWell and I would go with what he is comfortable with installing.
He is asking $850.00 for outdoor reset and hotwater priority installed with parts. Does that sound right or a little too much for this type of job?
#13
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,338
Upvotes: 0
Received 0 Upvotes
on
0 Posts
The unit itself probably goes about $350-400. Plus some misc parts, such as whether the Honeywell has an add-in for the priority. Plus an hour or two to wire everything. Probably about right, depending on your part of the country. And speaking of which, check your local utility programs. Some (like MA, where it's around $100) offer a rebate for outdoor reset controls. Often it's the electric utility, gas utility (but you're oil...), or local efficiency cooperative. dsireusa.org is a place that lists a lot of this stuff.
So good luck. Here's a (partial) checklist:
1) make sure the boiler is piped properly. In the absence of a good Biasi diagram, that Burnham one is a good point of reference. Note in that diagram how the zone circulator(s) are downstream of the expansion tank connection. This is known as 'pumping away' and is a first principle of good installation (google it for the book of the same name. It's a classic.)
2) make sure he pipes in a full size bypass with a quality globe valve. See that link on the comfort-calc site for more description.
3) ask for an anti-scald mixing valve on the domestic output of the indirect. Like a Honeywell AM101 or Taco 5000 series. Make sure it's piped with a thermal trap (downward length of pipe) like the directions say.
Good luck and enjoy.
So good luck. Here's a (partial) checklist:
1) make sure the boiler is piped properly. In the absence of a good Biasi diagram, that Burnham one is a good point of reference. Note in that diagram how the zone circulator(s) are downstream of the expansion tank connection. This is known as 'pumping away' and is a first principle of good installation (google it for the book of the same name. It's a classic.)
2) make sure he pipes in a full size bypass with a quality globe valve. See that link on the comfort-calc site for more description.
3) ask for an anti-scald mixing valve on the domestic output of the indirect. Like a Honeywell AM101 or Taco 5000 series. Make sure it's piped with a thermal trap (downward length of pipe) like the directions say.
Good luck and enjoy.
#14
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 6
Upvotes: 0
Received 0 Upvotes
on
0 Posts
ODR setup
Just want to confirm if the tech is doing right thing.
Boiler : Biasi B10-4
Burner : Reillo F-3
Control :
Relay - Taco SR 503 with Zone 1 priority
Aquastat - HoneyWell L7224A,C
Zones:
Zone1 - DHW priority (Indirect Water Tank)
Zone2 - 1st floor
Zone3- 2nd floor
Circulators: 3 Circulators are connected to SR 503 as suggested by Taco
Thermostat
1st floor - 2wire connected to Sr 503 Zone2 TT
2nd floor - 2 wire Not connected at this time (Will be done tomorrow)
Here is how wiring is done,
From SR 503 to L 7224A
N connected to L2
P Not connected
Zc +H connected to Zc
X1 connected to T
X2 connected to T/3
From SR 503 to everything
T connected to X1 on Sr 503
T/3 connected to X2 on SR 503
2 is not connected (Will be connected to outdoor reset + Hotwater reset)
1 is not connected (Will be connected to outdoor reset + Hot water reset)
ZR is not connected
L1 connected to 120V CKT
L2 connected to 120V CKT
L2 is also connected to N on SR 503
C2 is connected to Reillo burner (not sure where on burner)
B2 is not connected
C1 is not connected
B1 is connected to Reillo burner (not sure where on burner)
ZC connected to ZC+H (jumper) on SR 503
Just want to check if wiring is correct, since the tech mentioned he was doing this first time and got confused with Outdoor sensor wiring at first. it was resolved after a call to Honeywell.
Now I am a little nervous knowing he do not have much experience with it (Please dont ask why I went with them)
The good news is burner fires fine, heat works as it should on first floor. Hot water works fine and circulators go off when needed. 2nd floor and sensors are not hooked up today
I just want to be prepared and know if this is done correctly and utilize all the controls.
Boiler : Biasi B10-4
Burner : Reillo F-3
Control :
Relay - Taco SR 503 with Zone 1 priority
Aquastat - HoneyWell L7224A,C
Zones:
Zone1 - DHW priority (Indirect Water Tank)
Zone2 - 1st floor
Zone3- 2nd floor
Circulators: 3 Circulators are connected to SR 503 as suggested by Taco
Thermostat
1st floor - 2wire connected to Sr 503 Zone2 TT
2nd floor - 2 wire Not connected at this time (Will be done tomorrow)
Here is how wiring is done,
From SR 503 to L 7224A
N connected to L2
P Not connected
Zc +H connected to Zc
X1 connected to T
X2 connected to T/3
From SR 503 to everything
T connected to X1 on Sr 503
T/3 connected to X2 on SR 503
2 is not connected (Will be connected to outdoor reset + Hotwater reset)
1 is not connected (Will be connected to outdoor reset + Hot water reset)
ZR is not connected
L1 connected to 120V CKT
L2 connected to 120V CKT
L2 is also connected to N on SR 503
C2 is connected to Reillo burner (not sure where on burner)
B2 is not connected
C1 is not connected
B1 is connected to Reillo burner (not sure where on burner)
ZC connected to ZC+H (jumper) on SR 503
Just want to check if wiring is correct, since the tech mentioned he was doing this first time and got confused with Outdoor sensor wiring at first. it was resolved after a call to Honeywell.
Now I am a little nervous knowing he do not have much experience with it (Please dont ask why I went with them)
The good news is burner fires fine, heat works as it should on first floor. Hot water works fine and circulators go off when needed. 2nd floor and sensors are not hooked up today
I just want to be prepared and know if this is done correctly and utilize all the controls.
#16
Shouldn't make any difference electrically, because B2 and C2 are both the same point as far as the electrons are concerned, but B1 and B2 are generally used for the Burner, and C1 and C2 are used for the circ. I would ask him to follow convention and move the burner neutral wire from C2 to B2...