Ground Rod Rant
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 74
Upvotes: 0
Received 0 Upvotes
on
0 Posts
Ground Rod Rant
Pardon me while I vent.
Why don't the ground rod manufacturers make 9 foot rods????
I'm not an inspector, but I tend to notice things electrical when I visit homes. In virtually every instance, the rod is sticking up above ground by at least 6 inches. Yet NEC mandates that the rod must be IN THE GROUND the full 8 feet.
Let's be honest. Which installation would you prefer to tackle - driving the rod leaving 6 inches above ground? or digging a 12" deep hole (maybe through concrete) then drive the rod down below grade and try to make decent connections in a hole?
Do inspectors understand the situation and just ignore the 8 foot rule?
I should think a savvy manufacturer could come out with a 9 foot rod and market it as the only rod that meets code.
Thanks for the vent time and space.
Why don't the ground rod manufacturers make 9 foot rods????
I'm not an inspector, but I tend to notice things electrical when I visit homes. In virtually every instance, the rod is sticking up above ground by at least 6 inches. Yet NEC mandates that the rod must be IN THE GROUND the full 8 feet.
Let's be honest. Which installation would you prefer to tackle - driving the rod leaving 6 inches above ground? or digging a 12" deep hole (maybe through concrete) then drive the rod down below grade and try to make decent connections in a hole?
Do inspectors understand the situation and just ignore the 8 foot rule?
I should think a savvy manufacturer could come out with a 9 foot rod and market it as the only rod that meets code.
Thanks for the vent time and space.
#3
No offense but I feel the idea of a 9' rod is silly. Just drive the thing the last 6".
I do agree, why do folks leave that 6" sicking out?????
I do agree, why do folks leave that 6" sicking out?????
Last edited by twelvepole; 01-06-07 at 07:27 AM. Reason: Nonprogressive language edited
#5
The code says the top of the rod is to be flush or recessed unless protected from physical damage. Would't matter how long it is, it needs to be driven flush.
Cutting slots in concrete to get a GEC out of harms way and boring holes in a slab so the rod can be driven down to soil (with a roto-hammer if you do this for a living) is part of the job and should be figured into the cost of the job just like wire. conduit, and fittings.
Cutting slots in concrete to get a GEC out of harms way and boring holes in a slab so the rod can be driven down to soil (with a roto-hammer if you do this for a living) is part of the job and should be figured into the cost of the job just like wire. conduit, and fittings.
#6
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 44
Upvotes: 0
Received 0 Upvotes
on
0 Posts
Your right unclebill. However, it is also true that, "The upper end of the electrode shall be flush with or below ground level unless the aboveground end and the grounding electrode conductor attachment are protected against physical damage as specified in 250.10." (REF. 2005 NEC 250.53.(G).
You still need a minimum of 8' in the ground, so in order to have a stub you would need to install a rod of greater than 8' length.
You still need a minimum of 8' in the ground, so in order to have a stub you would need to install a rod of greater than 8' length.
#7
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 51
Upvotes: 0
Received 0 Upvotes
on
0 Posts
I just recently installed two 8' ground rods for a 200A upgrade. A single #4 bare copper wire connects to both of them then goes to the meter and main.
I left them about 6" above the ground and connected the wires. After they were inspected I drove them about 6" under and buried them along with the wire that goes between them.
I left them about 6" above the ground and connected the wires. After they were inspected I drove them about 6" under and buried them along with the wire that goes between them.
#9
Banned. Rule And/Or Policy Violation
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: North of Boston, MA.
Posts: 1,967
Upvotes: 0
Received 0 Upvotes
on
0 Posts
I just recently installed two 8' ground rods for a 200A upgrade. A single #4 bare copper wire connects to both of them then goes to the meter and main.
I left them about 6" above the ground and connected the wires. After they were inspected I drove them about 6" under and buried them along with the wire that goes between them.
I left them about 6" above the ground and connected the wires. After they were inspected I drove them about 6" under and buried them along with the wire that goes between them.
(Use direct burial connections)
Thank you.
#10
code comliant...maybe
Alot of electricians (around here anyway) have the bad habit of digging the ditch nd then thrwoing the ground rod in after (as in before they cover it up) Don't ask me how the inspectors pass it...not my jurisdiction...I drive the ground rod (partially) while the ditch is dug and then I only have to drive it four feet. Then drive it another six inches after grade...FWIW
#11
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 51
Upvotes: 0
Received 0 Upvotes
on
0 Posts
Not sure if I understand your point lectriclee. Is what I have done right? I did it the way the electrician wanted me to do it while he was installing the meter box and cutoff.
#12
Alot of electricians (around here anyway) have the bad habit of digging the ditch nd then thrwoing the ground rod in after (as in before they cover it up) Don't ask me how the inspectors pass it...not my jurisdiction..
250.53 (G) says this is ok if the ditch is 30 inches deep.
#13
"Alot of electricians (around here anyway) have the bad habit of digging the ditch nd then thrwoing the ground rod in after (as in before they cover it up) Don't ask me how the inspectors pass it..."
It passes because of Jwhites code quote.
WHY is this a "bad" practice???
It passes because of Jwhites code quote.
WHY is this a "bad" practice???
#15
I'm aware of the "unless protected from physical damage" blurb and elected to ignore it as it relates to the OPs gripe. ANYBODY here think providing the protection would be less work 99% of the time than driving the rod flush? Didn't think so.
Copper is one of the few elements found in "almost" pure form in nature and isn't subject to the corrosion that destroys most metals buried in soil in MOST circumstances. A copper plated rod and a brass clamp will outlast the building in all likelihood
Copper is one of the few elements found in "almost" pure form in nature and isn't subject to the corrosion that destroys most metals buried in soil in MOST circumstances. A copper plated rod and a brass clamp will outlast the building in all likelihood
#16
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 44
Upvotes: 0
Received 0 Upvotes
on
0 Posts
Pull in the horns uncle. IMHO it looked to me like the OP was looking for a way to leave a stub and not have to drill out concrete,etc. Just trying to let people know there are alternatives.
Without a doubt your method is the most widely used.
Without a doubt your method is the most widely used.
#17
Understood. And figured a pro would know that - and the ways around the issue in the first place. Horns were never out, just frustration at the direction some of these threads take.
#18
The inspectors who I have had dealings with, would not pass a 6 inch stub left sticking up from the ground rod. And, having driven a few, the last foot or so is normally easier to drive than the first bit, as the rod no longer flexes each time I hit it with the hammer.
Electrical conductivity aside, IHMO any part of the rod sticking out of the ground is a hazard. Children playing could be impailed by the thing, adults could trip over it, or the lawn mower could strike it.
I usually drive it flush, and the inspector will kick the grass around till he sees the acorn.
Electrical conductivity aside, IHMO any part of the rod sticking out of the ground is a hazard. Children playing could be impailed by the thing, adults could trip over it, or the lawn mower could strike it.
I usually drive it flush, and the inspector will kick the grass around till he sees the acorn.
#21
Howdy All,
I am not sure why the last 6" are not driven in the question originally posted, We use many methods from a Hammer Drill to a Post Driver and last but hopefully LEAST a Sledge Hammer...
The rod should be driven all the way, if you wish for it to be observed by the local AHJ then driving it down and digging out around it is the best call here, leave the dirt and cover it up when inspection is over.
I don't see the need for a 9' ground rod, now if we are looking at the fact someone could drive a 9' down and CUT OFF the remaining 1'...just dont like the idea of anything being CUT OFF.......it then begs to question IF the person actually drove the original rod down 8' to begin with.
My suggestion for the industry as I am an AHJ as well ( part-time now days when needed ) is to come up with a color embeded marking system within the rod...however there are ways around that as well....
in the end.....the 8' are fine....just need to drive it as intended and our hammer drills do a nice job getting it down below surface....also we clean around it to ensure no dirt gets into the end of the hammer drill anyway.
I am not sure why the last 6" are not driven in the question originally posted, We use many methods from a Hammer Drill to a Post Driver and last but hopefully LEAST a Sledge Hammer...
The rod should be driven all the way, if you wish for it to be observed by the local AHJ then driving it down and digging out around it is the best call here, leave the dirt and cover it up when inspection is over.
I don't see the need for a 9' ground rod, now if we are looking at the fact someone could drive a 9' down and CUT OFF the remaining 1'...just dont like the idea of anything being CUT OFF.......it then begs to question IF the person actually drove the original rod down 8' to begin with.
My suggestion for the industry as I am an AHJ as well ( part-time now days when needed ) is to come up with a color embeded marking system within the rod...however there are ways around that as well....
in the end.....the 8' are fine....just need to drive it as intended and our hammer drills do a nice job getting it down below surface....also we clean around it to ensure no dirt gets into the end of the hammer drill anyway.
#22
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2
Upvotes: 0
Received 0 Upvotes
on
0 Posts
Ground rod etiquette
I'm not a residential electrician but I have industrial electrical training through an industrial electrical apprenticeship. Residential and Industrial electrical wiring practices seem to follow different rules. I have heard that in this area the ground rods are not to be 'driven' into the ground by a hammer and the top end can show no evidence of being struck by one. I've heard that the top of the rod is painted to help the inspector determine if the rod was driven by a hammer. It seems the common method around here is to use water and an up and down plunging motion that sinks the rod down by hand. Another key point used around here is that the rod must be burried out from under the house soffits / eves where the soil is damp from rain (better ground). Are these good ideas or am I just all wet?