Electrical Outlets behind Free Standing Bookcases


  #1  
Old 07-13-11, 10:49 AM
K
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 7
Upvotes: 0
Received 0 Upvotes on 0 Posts
Electrical Outlets behind Free Standing Bookcases

I am placing two free standing bookcases that flank my desk in my home office. Each will cover one of the only two electrical outlets on that wall. My desk equipment draws power from a UPS installed inside the desk in a vented compartment made to hold computer equipment. The UPS draws power from one of the two outlets.



Technically placing the bookcases in front the outlets is not improper since the bookcases are not 'built-in'. But they will be fastened at the top to prevent tipping. And they will be very heavy once loaded up. So convenient access to these outlets will be impractical.

I am planning to install a duplex outlet in the base of each bookcase. There is ample clearance below to set a normal box. I still need an outlet in the wall to plug in the UPS as well as the in-cabinet accent lighting. These would then plug in to the outlets through 3 wire #12 or 14 appliance cord (as I write this I do not know the amperage of the circuit). These can not replace the existing in-wall receptacles as I still need an outlet in the wall to plug in the UPS as well as the in-cabinet accent lighting.

These outlets might be used for illuminated display pieces, Christmas ornaments and audio equipment.

Does anyone see any flaws in this plan? Any suggestions for improvements?
 
  #2  
Old 07-13-11, 11:56 AM
I
Forum Topic Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Near Lansing, Michigan
Posts: 9,785
Upvotes: 0
Received 45 Upvotes on 43 Posts
A removable panel in the back of the case is always handy. Also plug strips with right angle plugs to avoid pinching the cord being the case. How you actually execute it depends a lot on the construction of the case and the look.

I have installed plugmold strips inside cabinets and shelving units for people who have a lot of lighted christmas knick knacks.

 
  #3  
Old 07-13-11, 02:30 PM
chandler's Avatar
Banned. Rule And/Or Policy Violation
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 36,608
Upvotes: 0
Received 9 Upvotes on 8 Posts
I second the use of removable panel type opening in the bookcase, in order to make use of the receptacle. Technically when you attached it to the wall, it became "built in" and ceased to be free standing, so the receptacles should be exposed to the inside of the cabinet.
 
  #4  
Old 07-14-11, 01:36 AM
J
Banned. Rule And/Or Policy Violation
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: KS
Posts: 1,655
Upvotes: 0
Received 1 Upvote on 1 Post
Originally Posted by chandler View Post
I second the use of removable panel type opening in the bookcase, in order to make use of the receptacle. Technically when you attached it to the wall, it became "built in" and ceased to be free standing, so the receptacles should be exposed to the inside of the cabinet.
Not sure that's true. Most furniture that has the potential to be top-heavy (including bookcases, dressers, and entertainment centers) is now required to have some manufacturer provided means of fastening it to the wall - whether it be a strap, hook, or ledger. It's due to kids being killed or hurt climbing on things that tip over easily. But none of these would be considered 'built in' just because they are fastened to the wall.
 
  #5  
Old 07-14-11, 02:53 AM
chandler's Avatar
Banned. Rule And/Or Policy Violation
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 36,608
Upvotes: 0
Received 9 Upvotes on 8 Posts
I know WHY it is done, but the bookcase becomes immovable at the time it is fastened to the wall. Code calls for receptacles at certain intervals around the perimeter of a room. You occlude one with an immovable object, you have technically violated code. I'm not wanting to get into an argument, but it is what it is.
 
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
 
Ask a Question
Question Title:
Description:
Your question will be posted in: