Is it ok to use standard 12-2 romex for a switch leg?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Is it ok to use standard 12-2 romex for a switch leg?
I have an existing junction box inside a kitchen cabinet with the receptacle (and switch) to turn on and off the garbage disposer. The box sits at the base of the cabinet which worries me. So I am going to move it higher above the drain connections and hot & cold supply valves, that way if anything leaks there is no danger of the box getting on touch with a puddle of water.
Now, I need to put in a switch for the disposer on the wall. To run a switch leg up and back...can I use standard 12-2 romex and "steal" the neutral conductor as one of the legs? I probably should use a MC flex conduit but I am all out and don't feel like buying a 50ft roll for the 40" or so I need.
I happen to have a stretch of romex around. Just not sure it is kosher to do.
Now, I need to put in a switch for the disposer on the wall. To run a switch leg up and back...can I use standard 12-2 romex and "steal" the neutral conductor as one of the legs? I probably should use a MC flex conduit but I am all out and don't feel like buying a 50ft roll for the 40" or so I need.
I happen to have a stretch of romex around. Just not sure it is kosher to do.
#2
Under pre 2011 NEC yes if you remark the white as an ungrounded conductor on both ends. Under 2011 you must have a neutral in the switch box even if not used so you would need 12-3.
#3
Member
A neutral is only needed for lighting loads. MC really doesn't buy you much as it is not rated for physical protection.
#5
Member
Under pre 2011 NEC yes if you remark the white as an ungrounded conductor on both ends. Under 2011 you must have a neutral in the switch box even if not used so you would need 12-3.
A few questions:
Is that the reasoning? Are there any other issues involved?
I'm guessing that the end of the neutral (unused in the switch box)should be capped?
To what would the other end of the unused neutral be connected?-the neutral in the light?
Thanks in advance.
#7
Member
Thread Starter
The only reason I considered MC was I still have a reels of #12 red, black, yellow, green conductors laying around and I could connection the box and the switch with MC with my choice of conductors.
#8
Member
Thread Starter
Wyr, I didn't think to use two runs of 12-2 because I would think I would just use a 12-3 before considering that option.
#9
Member
Thread Starter
OK I will use a 12-3 then.
Just out of curiosity I have never used one of those switches, you know those with a light indicator on it so you can see it in the dark? How are those powered do you need to run a neutral there for that to work?
Just out of curiosity I have never used one of those switches, you know those with a light indicator on it so you can see it in the dark? How are those powered do you need to run a neutral there for that to work?
#10
How are those powered do you need to run a neutral there for that to work?
*Can not verify 5ma is correct, just what I read here.
#11
Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 630
Upvotes: 0
Received 0 Upvotes
on
0 Posts
Could you please supply a code reference for requiring an un-used neutral in a switch box . Does it just apply to cable / Romex / MC work or does it apply to conduit jobs ?
Have not seen that in any of the continuing education courses , that I have taken ?
Years ago , some one made a plastic switch plate that had a small neon lite . The 2 wires to the neon lamp attached to the 2 screws on a SP switch . No neutral was needed . The circuit was completed through the incandescent lamp . Long before compact florescents or LED's .
Thanks , :-)
Wyr
God bless
Have not seen that in any of the continuing education courses , that I have taken ?
Years ago , some one made a plastic switch plate that had a small neon lite . The 2 wires to the neon lamp attached to the 2 screws on a SP switch . No neutral was needed . The circuit was completed through the incandescent lamp . Long before compact florescents or LED's .
Thanks , :-)
Wyr
God bless
#13
Member
NEC 404.2(C) - Title is "Switches Controlling Lighting Loads"
and at the bottom
Informational Note: The provision for a (future) grounded
conductor is to complete a circuit path for electronic light-
ing control devices.
and at the bottom
Informational Note: The provision for a (future) grounded
conductor is to complete a circuit path for electronic light-
ing control devices.
#15
Member
As a follow-up to my mini hijack post (#5, sorry), and Ray's informative reply(#6), could a "future use" be: extending the circuit by connecting the new black to the constant hot line, new neutral to capped neutral, and bundling the ground wires?
(Of course, some pigtails would be needed, and all this presumes that said extension was safe and to code.)
(Of course, some pigtails would be needed, and all this presumes that said extension was safe and to code.)
#16
could a "future use" be: extending the circuit by connecting the new black to the constant hot line, new neutral to capped neutral, and bundling the ground wires?
#17
Banned. Rule And/Or Policy Violation
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: KS
Posts: 1,655
Upvotes: 0
Received 0 Upvotes
on
0 Posts
Technically yes, but it would be bad practice if the new load is anything but lighting.
The reason it was mandated is there are more and more electronic switches going on the market that require a neutral to function.
The reason it was mandated is there are more and more electronic switches going on the market that require a neutral to function.
#20
Member
Technically yes, but it would be bad practice if the new load is anything but lighting.
The reason it was mandated is there are more and more electronic switches going on the market that require a neutral to function.
The reason it was mandated is there are more and more electronic switches going on the market that require a neutral to function.