Do you say aught or naught?

Reply

  #1  
Old 08-14-19, 08:36 AM
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 52
Received 0 Votes on 0 Posts
Do you say aught or naught?

Do you say “aught” or “naught” for 1/0 2/0 3/0 4/0 wires?
 
Sponsored Links

Popular Reply

 
08-15-19, 10:29 AM
Fred_C_Dobbs
Fred_C_Dobbs is offline
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 429
Received 10 Votes on 8 Posts
Jethro Bodine aspired to be a "double-naught spy" but I never yet heard anyone say they had a rifle chambered in "thirty-naught-six."
 
  #2  
Old 08-14-19, 10:52 AM
PJmax's Avatar
Group Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Northern NJ - USA
Posts: 52,661
Received 340 Votes on 318 Posts
It wouldn't be naught. It would be aught.

Not to get involved in a major discussion about what's correct.......
Those are old English words and are technically not correct but aught has been used a long time as a reference to 0. So you say "aught".
 
  #3  
Old 08-14-19, 10:52 AM
Forum Topic Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Near Lansing, Michigan
Posts: 10,944
Received 42 Votes on 40 Posts
I say "four aught" or "four oh"
 
  #4  
Old 08-14-19, 02:29 PM
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Wet side of Washington state.
Posts: 18,482
Received 25 Votes on 19 Posts
Despite what the others have written either pronunciation is correct.
 
  #5  
Old 08-14-19, 02:35 PM
PJmax's Avatar
Group Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Northern NJ - USA
Posts: 52,661
Received 340 Votes on 318 Posts
Hi Furd..... I had a feeling you'd weigh in on this one.
 
  #6  
Old 08-14-19, 03:00 PM
Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,030
Received 57 Votes on 52 Posts
I take an interest in where words came from sometimes, so suppose that one could check out the origination of aught or naught in order to form a conclusion, but in this case I've always assumed that is has simpler derivative. 1/0 could be "1 zero" for example, except that 1 zero could be confused with "10" and there is already a 10 gauge wire, or it could have been referred to as "one oh", but "one oh oh oh oh" could get confusing, so I'm of the opinion that it's actually pronounced "OT", unique to its' own application, for clarity, somewhat similar to the phonetic alphabet used in the military.
 
  #7  
Old 08-14-19, 05:49 PM
CasualJoe's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 9,978
Received 22 Votes on 17 Posts
Just my opinion, but I think you ought to say aught.
 
  #8  
Old 08-14-19, 05:50 PM
XSleeper's Avatar
Group Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 23,123
Received 194 Votes on 180 Posts
4 aught steel wool....... 0000.
 
  #9  
Old 08-15-19, 10:29 AM
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 429
Received 10 Votes on 8 Posts
Jethro Bodine aspired to be a "double-naught spy" but I never yet heard anyone say they had a rifle chambered in "thirty-naught-six."
 
CasualJoe, XSleeper voted this post useful.
  #10  
Old 08-16-19, 10:14 AM
Forum Topic Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 4,646
Received 19 Votes on 18 Posts
Some people have too much time on their hands... like this person who references that historically naught is correct, and aught is a "nineteenth century corruption of the word".

https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=2013

Apparently both are considered acceptable linguistically to refer to zero. Buy for the electrical field - I'll leave that to the others to argue out.
 
  #11  
Old 08-16-19, 10:40 AM
XSleeper's Avatar
Group Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 23,123
Received 194 Votes on 180 Posts
Zero and nothing are similar words but not really always interchangeable. I'd say the same goes for aught and naught.
 
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Display Modes
 
Ask a Question
Question Title:
Description:
Your question will be posted in: