Do you say aught or naught?

Reply

  #1  
Old 08-14-19, 09:36 AM
E
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 52
Received 0 Votes on 0 Posts
Do you say aught or naught?

Do you say “aught” or “naught” for 1/0 2/0 3/0 4/0 wires?
 

Popular Reply

 
08-15-19, 11:29 AM
Fred_C_Dobbs
Fred_C_Dobbs is offline
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 485
Received 28 Votes on 21 Posts
Jethro Bodine aspired to be a "double-naught spy" but I never yet heard anyone say they had a rifle chambered in "thirty-naught-six."
 
  #2  
Old 08-14-19, 11:52 AM
PJmax's Avatar
Group Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Northern NJ - USA
Posts: 60,761
Received 1,321 Votes on 1,221 Posts
It wouldn't be naught. It would be aught.

Not to get involved in a major discussion about what's correct.......
Those are old English words and are technically not correct but aught has been used a long time as a reference to 0. So you say "aught".
 
  #3  
Old 08-14-19, 11:52 AM
I
Forum Topic Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Near Lansing, Michigan
Posts: 10,943
Received 44 Votes on 42 Posts
I say "four aught" or "four oh"
 
  #4  
Old 08-14-19, 03:29 PM
F
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Wet side of Washington state.
Posts: 18,495
Received 36 Votes on 28 Posts
Despite what the others have written either pronunciation is correct.
 
  #5  
Old 08-14-19, 03:35 PM
PJmax's Avatar
Group Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Northern NJ - USA
Posts: 60,761
Received 1,321 Votes on 1,221 Posts
Hi Furd..... I had a feeling you'd weigh in on this one.
 
  #6  
Old 08-14-19, 04:00 PM
A
Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,088
Received 68 Votes on 62 Posts
I take an interest in where words came from sometimes, so suppose that one could check out the origination of aught or naught in order to form a conclusion, but in this case I've always assumed that is has simpler derivative. 1/0 could be "1 zero" for example, except that 1 zero could be confused with "10" and there is already a 10 gauge wire, or it could have been referred to as "one oh", but "one oh oh oh oh" could get confusing, so I'm of the opinion that it's actually pronounced "OT", unique to its' own application, for clarity, somewhat similar to the phonetic alphabet used in the military.
 
  #7  
Old 08-14-19, 06:49 PM
CasualJoe's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 10,754
Received 97 Votes on 87 Posts
Just my opinion, but I think you ought to say aught.
 
  #8  
Old 08-14-19, 06:50 PM
XSleeper's Avatar
Group Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 26,524
Received 776 Votes on 716 Posts
4 aught steel wool....... 0000.
 
  #9  
Old 08-15-19, 11:29 AM
F
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 485
Received 28 Votes on 21 Posts
Jethro Bodine aspired to be a "double-naught spy" but I never yet heard anyone say they had a rifle chambered in "thirty-naught-six."
 
CasualJoe, XSleeper voted this post useful.
  #10  
Old 08-16-19, 11:14 AM
Z
Forum Topic Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 5,544
Received 153 Votes on 136 Posts
Some people have too much time on their hands... like this person who references that historically naught is correct, and aught is a "nineteenth century corruption of the word".

https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=2013

Apparently both are considered acceptable linguistically to refer to zero. Buy for the electrical field - I'll leave that to the others to argue out.
 
  #11  
Old 08-16-19, 11:40 AM
XSleeper's Avatar
Group Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 26,524
Received 776 Votes on 716 Posts
Zero and nothing are similar words but not really always interchangeable. I'd say the same goes for aught and naught.
 
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
 
Ask a Question
Question Title:
Description:
Your question will be posted in: