> >
>

Window Header: (2-2x8s) VS (2-2x6s + 2-2x4s)?

#1
11-13-13, 04:42 PM
Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1
Window Header: (2-2x8s) VS (2-2x6s + 2-2x4s)?

I have a bunch of 2x6s that I need to use, but the spanning chart says to use 2-2x8s. If I put a 2x4 above and under, can I use 2-2x6s instead? If not, is there an acceptable way to use 2x6s instead of 2x8s? Thank you for your answers :-)

In case it is relevant: I'm spanning 60" on a small(16' wide) single story house with a snow load of 35.

#2
11-13-13, 05:14 PM
Group Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 20,516
http://www.duluthmn.gov/building_saf...ial%20Code.pdf

Even though 16' widths aren't listed in the charts above, I'm pretty sure the answer is no.

#3
11-13-13, 07:18 PM
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 3,196
Strict interpretation of the linked code would tell you not to do it. Especially if the work is being done under permit, with a required framing inspection performed by the building department before you button things up.

However, from an engineering/mathematical standpoint, sandwiching the 2 x 6s between flat 2 x 4s results in a member that will actually be somewhat stronger than the "pure" double 2 x 8 header. This is because the built-up member will have 17% greater depth than the standard 2 x 8 header (8.5" vs. 7.25"), and the extreme fiber-to-centroid distance is squared when computing the section modulus (the measure of a member's strength in bending). The foregoing is based on a presumption that the flat 2 x 4s will be properly attached (glued and screwed) to the 2 x 6s, meaning the assembly performs as a single unit with no chance of separation.

#4
11-14-13, 12:48 PM
Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 457
Ask the "Man" at the BD. IMO, you are fine; Chapter 5 - Floors At 30#snow; 5'5" -----------at 50#sn.;4'8"------------middle of those two is 5' at 40# snow, not even figuring in you are only 3/4 the total span of 20' and less snow load.

Gary

#5
11-14-13, 03:52 PM
Group Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 20,516
Ah.... I see the problem. Duluth's snow load is 70#. glad I don't live there! LOL

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off