Furnace Efficiency
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: north dakota
Posts: 170
Upvotes: 0
Received 0 Upvotes
on
0 Posts
Furnace Efficiency
My natural gas furnace (boiler) in the lower level of my bilevel is about 30yr old.
Since, the flame needs air to burn:
Is it more efficient to draw the 60deg air from the lower level (obviously my house has enough leaks and cracks for a furnace to work),
or, would it be more efficient to draw in 20deg outside air?
With outside air the furnace wouldn't draw 60deg air up the chimney,
but on the other hand, wouldn't the flame be hotter and thus heat the boiler water quicker with the warmer inside air?
SteveS
Since, the flame needs air to burn:
Is it more efficient to draw the 60deg air from the lower level (obviously my house has enough leaks and cracks for a furnace to work),
or, would it be more efficient to draw in 20deg outside air?
With outside air the furnace wouldn't draw 60deg air up the chimney,
but on the other hand, wouldn't the flame be hotter and thus heat the boiler water quicker with the warmer inside air?
SteveS
#2
Originally Posted by Skramy
My natural gas furnace (boiler) in the lower level of my bilevel is about 30yr old.
Since, the flame needs air to burn:
Is it more efficient to draw the 60deg air from the lower level (obviously my house has enough leaks and cracks for a furnace to work),
or, would it be more efficient to draw in 20deg outside air?
With outside air the furnace wouldn't draw 60deg air up the chimney,
but on the other hand, wouldn't the flame be hotter and thus heat the boiler water quicker with the warmer inside air?
SteveS
Since, the flame needs air to burn:
Is it more efficient to draw the 60deg air from the lower level (obviously my house has enough leaks and cracks for a furnace to work),
or, would it be more efficient to draw in 20deg outside air?
With outside air the furnace wouldn't draw 60deg air up the chimney,
but on the other hand, wouldn't the flame be hotter and thus heat the boiler water quicker with the warmer inside air?
SteveS
I have supposed that fire is SOOOO hot that it so overwhelms the temperature of the fresh air being drawn in. And because of this, I have a feeling that the fresh air being drawn into a sealed combustion burner would be more efficient.
Any one else?
#3
I don't have a fact, but they say in the newer sealed (90%) system, it burners hotter and cleaner when it uses outside air..
The air is cleaner, and don't have the household fumes.. and what not in it.
The air is cleaner, and don't have the household fumes.. and what not in it.
#5
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 216
Upvotes: 0
Received 0 Upvotes
on
0 Posts
On effiency:
Actually, there would have to be a small increase in temp across the heat exchanger if you were pulling inside air as opposed to outside air due to some of your BTUs would have to heat the cold air up to room temp as opposed to just heating room temp up to whatever, but this would be offset by the amount of outside air that would be drawn into your house due to you venting inside air for combustion.
So in theory maybe, in reality no change.
Actually, there would have to be a small increase in temp across the heat exchanger if you were pulling inside air as opposed to outside air due to some of your BTUs would have to heat the cold air up to room temp as opposed to just heating room temp up to whatever, but this would be offset by the amount of outside air that would be drawn into your house due to you venting inside air for combustion.
So in theory maybe, in reality no change.