Replacing drop ceiling 2X2 with seamless look
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Replacing drop ceiling 2X2 with seamless look
I have a dingy drop ceiling with 2X2 that appears to be at least 15-20 years old. The squares have the small dots in them and have an off white dingy/dirty look that seems to match the grid system. It's not feasible to replace with sheetrock given the amount of electrical and water hard lines. I thought of a few different options:
1) Replace drop ceiling with brand new white tiles and paint existing grid white
2) Replace drop ceiling with armstrong PVC ceiling that have a smooth/sheetrock appearance
3) Replace drop ceiling with tongue/groove tiles
For #3, would that make access to the above utilities harder? I could not easily 'drop' a the tiles that are 'screwed' into the grid system. Would I use access panels?
1) Replace drop ceiling with brand new white tiles and paint existing grid white
2) Replace drop ceiling with armstrong PVC ceiling that have a smooth/sheetrock appearance
3) Replace drop ceiling with tongue/groove tiles
For #3, would that make access to the above utilities harder? I could not easily 'drop' a the tiles that are 'screwed' into the grid system. Would I use access panels?
#2
Removing the old tiles and painting the grid would be the easiest. I see it done all the time in commercial spaces with good results. You can then install pretty much whatever you like for tiles as long as the grid is supported correctly. You could just use a 2x2 tile, Drywall panels, or even make up some wood panels for a different look.
"Removable" tongue and groove ceiling systems still make the area above the ceiling accessible, but often you must disassemble the ceiling to do so. It all depends on how accessible you want it.
"Removable" tongue and groove ceiling systems still make the area above the ceiling accessible, but often you must disassemble the ceiling to do so. It all depends on how accessible you want it.

#3
Member
Thread Starter
Tongue and groove would mimic sheetrock appearance and just look better overall, correct? And, if it's a pain to remove, can't I just cut into it for an access panel?
#4
I'm all for covering a basement ceiling but something can be said for later access. I go to customers houses where the basement ceiling is covered. Doesn't matter if it's sheetrock or splined tile or tongue and groove.... to me.... all those finishes make for an un-openable ceiling. As an electrical contractor I wouldn't be messing with any type of ceiling like that. The customer would be out of luck.
It's one thing to open that ceiling.... quite another to close it back up.
It's one thing to open that ceiling.... quite another to close it back up.
#5
Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by PJmax
I'm all for covering a basement ceiling but something can be said for later access. I go to customers houses where the basement ceiling is covered. Doesn't matter if it's sheetrock or splined tile or tongue and groove.... to me.... all those finishes make for an un-openable ceiling. As an electrical contractor I wouldn't be messing with any type of ceiling like that. The customer would be out of luck.
It's one thing to open that ceiling.... quite another to close it back up.
It's one thing to open that ceiling.... quite another to close it back up.
Good to hear from you my good man.
I assume you would prefer drop down for full access. In 4 years, I've only needed to get access to 4 places for sprinklers but anything can happen. Aside from just replacing tiles within the existing (or new) drop ceiling system, what else could I do for a more seamless sheetrock like finish?
#6
Forum Topic Moderator
The squares have the small dots in them and have an off white dingy/dirty look that seems to match the grid system.
#7
A tile without holes has a cleaner look than the ones that do. Also, a revealed tile (one that hangs below the grid) looks nicer than one that is even with the grid.
Sadly the home stores have very few tile choices available. You may want to go to a ceiling supplier for better choices.
Sadly the home stores have very few tile choices available. You may want to go to a ceiling supplier for better choices.
#8
Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by Tolyn Ironhand
A tile without holes has a cleaner look than the ones that do. Also, a revealed tile (one that hangs below the grid) looks nicer than one that is even with the grid.
Sadly the home stores have very few tile choices available. You may want to go to a ceiling supplier for better choices.
Sadly the home stores have very few tile choices available. You may want to go to a ceiling supplier for better choices.
#10
Member
Thread Starter
https://www.armstrongceilings.com/co...rect_term=1911 This??
Yes, personal preference but why wouldn't flat smooth be more desirable? Given height is a concern, should I concern surface mount and access panels?
Yes, personal preference but why wouldn't flat smooth be more desirable? Given height is a concern, should I concern surface mount and access panels?
#11
Forum Topic Moderator
The height loss is minimal. IMO with the tiles dropping slightly below the grid it looks nicer. It draws less attention to the grid.
Tolyn Ironhand
voted this post useful.
#12
The look is personal, go to the Armstrong website and look for options, it's only limited by your budget.
https://www.armstrongceilings.com/residential/en-us/
And as far as the concern about drywalling a ceiling due to access.
How many times have you ever had to open a wall/ ceiling in the house to get to something? Not saying it doesn't happen but I would not allow that to be the deciding factor!
https://www.armstrongceilings.com/residential/en-us/
And as far as the concern about drywalling a ceiling due to access.
How many times have you ever had to open a wall/ ceiling in the house to get to something? Not saying it doesn't happen but I would not allow that to be the deciding factor!
#13
Member
And Drywall is very patchable or if you need to get into the ceiling you an install an access panel at that time.
#14
Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by marksr
the height loss is minimal. IMO with the tiles dropping slightly below the grid it looks nicer. It draws less attention to the grid.
If so, I woud need to use access panels for the various spots I will need access to such as sprinklers/water/etc.
Originally Posted by Marq1
The look is personal, go to the Armstrong website and look for options, it's only limited by your budget.
https://www.armstrongceilings.com/residential/en-us/
And as far as the concern about drywalling a ceiling due to access.
How many times have you ever had to open a wall/ ceiling in the house to get to something? Not saying it doesn't happen but I would not allow that to be the deciding factor!
https://www.armstrongceilings.com/residential/en-us/
And as far as the concern about drywalling a ceiling due to access.
How many times have you ever had to open a wall/ ceiling in the house to get to something? Not saying it doesn't happen but I would not allow that to be the deciding factor!
Originally Posted by tightcoat
And Drywall is very patchable or if you need to get into the ceiling you an install an access panel at that time.
#15
Member
Thread Starter
I am slowly narrowing this down. Are gridstone gypsum panel a typical cheap 2X2? They are offwhite and boss wants a white/sheetrock like appearance. PVC is WHITE and only a bit more $$$ so that would work too.
#17
I would recommend going to a store/distributor and seeing them in person before deciding on a tile. You could also just buy drywall and cut your own panels and paint them a color of your choice. (as I mentioned in my post #2)
#18
Member
Thread Starter
I guess that's my best choice. I was leaning towards PVC but read has less noise reduction and increase costs vs other tiles. What are the cheap typical tiles made of? Plaster of Paris? Mineral Fiber? I like the weight/structure of the Gypsum mentioned above but I'd have to paint them which is an increased cost.
#23
Member
Thread Starter
Is there a hierarchy of materials that are better than others? Or just go by style/color/price? I like the Gypsum as it feels like it will hold up better but the tile is not the white I am looking for which will require me to paint all of the tiles.
#24
In my experience the higher the price the fancier and more durable the tile ends up being.
Gypsum panels I have seen have a white vinyl coating on them for easy cleaning as they are mostly installed in commercial kitchens, not the off-white as you describe.
Gypsum panels I have seen have a white vinyl coating on them for easy cleaning as they are mostly installed in commercial kitchens, not the off-white as you describe.
#25
Member
Thread Starter
I like the heft but cost/effort to paint isn't ideal. I'll look for something white from Armstrong. The website doesn't detail the 'weight' so it's a guessing game.
#26
Member
I’ve just had a thought. They make vinyl coated gypsum board. It is used a lot in the mobile home industry. You might find a color and pattern you like and it is Only 1/4” or 3/8” thick which would lighten the load on the grid and you.
One more thing, if you go with 1/2” gypsum board you won’t really get 4 pieces from an 8’ long sheet because you will or probably will cut the tapered edges off.
One more thing, if you go with 1/2” gypsum board you won’t really get 4 pieces from an 8’ long sheet because you will or probably will cut the tapered edges off.
#27
Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by tightcoat
I’ve just had a thought. They make vinyl coated gypsum board. It is used a lot in the mobile home industry. You might find a color and pattern you like and it is Only 1/4” or 3/8” thick which would lighten the load on the grid and you.
One more thing, if you go with 1/2” gypsum board you won’t really get 4 pieces from an 8’ long sheet because you will or probably will cut the tapered edges off.
One more thing, if you go with 1/2” gypsum board you won’t really get 4 pieces from an 8’ long sheet because you will or probably will cut the tapered edges off.
My contractor dropped off a 1/2" Gypsum 2X2 and I really liked it. It was heavy and just felt like a better product than fiber tiles I have seen in the past. The only issue is off white/chalk color that I would need to paint. I just need to find a white one with the same appearance and that will work well for me. Thanks.
#28
Member
Seems to me like painting a sheet of drywall before it is cut into the 2' square pieces would be pretty simple and would go fast. And if you cut off the tapered edges you only have to paint the middle two feet.
Yes you can buy 2' square pieces at the big box stores but they would have to be painted individually. Just lay them out on the driveway and roll them.
Yes you can buy 2' square pieces at the big box stores but they would have to be painted individually. Just lay them out on the driveway and roll them.
#29
Member
Thread Starter
I thought of that but I didn't see anyone recommending it so I thought it was a silly idea. Is it because miner fiber tiles are white and less expensive? Why would anyone want gypsum tiles if they can just go the paint/cut sheetrock route?
#30
Member
Maybe I am confused. SheetRock is gypsum board, one of many brands and some might be whiter than others. There is paper on either side but the inside is gypsum, not much different from plaster in composition. I think the only way to get a sheetrock look as you mentioned in the original post is with gypsum drywall. If the track is the same color and sheen as the panels it will not be too distracting, IMO. Now there are such things as gypsum medallions and moldings and the like and I suppose there could be 2' square cast gypsum panels. I would think these would be quite expensive, though possibly more decorative than a flat piece of gypsum drywall. Gypsum drywall is easy to cut and trim and possibly more durable than other tile but then how much abuse does a ceiling get? And if the weight of the 1/2" panels seems too great then go with 3/8". It might not be much cheaper but would be lighter and easier to handle once it is cut. It will be a little harder to handle 4' X 8' sheets of 3/8", however.
How large is your ceiling? How is the track suspended? I think it would be a simple matter to add some supports while the panels are absent if you want more weight carrying capacity.
Sounds like decision time. Let us know what you do and how it turns out.
How large is your ceiling? How is the track suspended? I think it would be a simple matter to add some supports while the panels are absent if you want more weight carrying capacity.
Sounds like decision time. Let us know what you do and how it turns out.
#31
Member
Thread Starter
I think it's just a terminology issue or me not explaining it properly. It's 3 different spaces with some existing sheet rock and then an existing 2X2 suspended ceiling. There are 3 spaces with some ceiling tiles: 22X8,12X14, and 12X12. I see several gypsum products with a vinyl-ish face that has a painted appearance. This dry-wall look gives me, IMHO, the closest to dry wall I can get. I spoke with Gridstone regarding their product and they made it clear it is not acoustic tile like my existing miner fiber so I started to question my approach rather than going with a typical white mineral fiber that that is probably much cheaper. I also have not read any one recommending cutting painted sheetrock into 2X2 so I thought I am way off basis with my idea.
#32
I have been suggesting drywall panels since post #3 (Drywall, sheetrock, and gypsum are all the same thing)
Because of the tapered edges on a sheet of drywall, you will only get 4 pieces out of a 4x8 sheet of drywall. That means you will waste about half of a sheet so it might not make sense to go that route, although I haven't priced it out. If you have any smaller grid openings than 2x2 it may make better sense. Also, remember that 2x2 tiles are not 2x2. They are about 23.75" x 23.75"
You could also get precut 2x4 drywall tiles and cut them in half.
Because of the tapered edges on a sheet of drywall, you will only get 4 pieces out of a 4x8 sheet of drywall. That means you will waste about half of a sheet so it might not make sense to go that route, although I haven't priced it out. If you have any smaller grid openings than 2x2 it may make better sense. Also, remember that 2x2 tiles are not 2x2. They are about 23.75" x 23.75"
You could also get precut 2x4 drywall tiles and cut them in half.
#33
Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by Tolyn Ironhand
I have been suggesting drywall panels since post #3 (Drywall, sheetrock, and gypsum are all the same thing)
Because of the tapered edges on a sheet of drywall, you will only get 4 pieces out of a 4x8 sheet of drywall. That means you will waste about half of a sheet so it might not make sense to go that route, although I haven't priced it out. If you have any smaller grid openings than 2x2 it may make better sense. Also, remember that 2x2 tiles are not 2x2. They are about 23.75" x 23.75"
You could also get precut 2x4 drywall tiles and cut them in half.
Because of the tapered edges on a sheet of drywall, you will only get 4 pieces out of a 4x8 sheet of drywall. That means you will waste about half of a sheet so it might not make sense to go that route, although I haven't priced it out. If you have any smaller grid openings than 2x2 it may make better sense. Also, remember that 2x2 tiles are not 2x2. They are about 23.75" x 23.75"
You could also get precut 2x4 drywall tiles and cut them in half.
Last edited by sagosto63; 07-18-22 at 07:21 PM.
#34
Member
In an earlier post #26, I think I said this: One more thing, if you go with 1/2” gypsum board you won’t really get 4 pieces from an 8’ long sheet because you will or probably will cut the tapered edges off.
Of course I meant 8 pieces. But if you remove the tapered edges you will get only 4 per sheet.
I think you have seen all the advice we have to offer. What did you do? How do you like it?
Of course I meant 8 pieces. But if you remove the tapered edges you will get only 4 per sheet.
I think you have seen all the advice we have to offer. What did you do? How do you like it?
#36
Member
Thread Starter
Thanks for all the advice. I think I am between a pre-fabricated gypsum 2X2 vs. sheet rock that's cut and painted vs new white mineral fiber. Mineral fiber is a cheaper product and I don't have to reinforce the existing grid which will also save monies. It depends if I can find a mineral fiber that has a smooth white appearance.
#37
Member
Thread Starter
I re-read this thread and I see the confusion. I am (was) debating Goldbond Gypsum Gold Bond® Gridstone® Gypsum Ceiling Panels (goldbondbuilding.com) which has a white vinyl colored side that mimics white paint. Unfortunately, I did not realize basic sheetrock is also gypsum). When I put a sample 2X2 tile up in the existing grid, the vinyl has an off-white gray color and not a more bright white color that the boss wants for the sheetrock/ceiling type look. Instead of looking for 2X2 tiles, I THINK I am going to go with 1/4" sheetrock and just paint it. This should be much lighter than the Goldbond product and require less support. I am just not sure how to get any sort of reveal and might have to settle with a lay-in appearance. Should I be worried about any sagging?
#39
Member
Thread Starter
The standard size is 1/2" right? There appears to be a 3/8" size but not sure how much weight loss it will give me.